Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Lesson of the Occupy Movement - The Ed Show and Hemingway

Last night, I was watching the Ed Show on MSNBC.  Ed had a guy on there who was talking about the 99% movement in terms of us needing to learn lessons from the occupiers.  It made me realize that many of these big name people have not been actively “doing” in the occupations around this country and the world.  I mean, I knew this, but it didn’t really register until last night.  I, on the other hand, have been involved.  I have done something these supposedly very smart people have not.  Why?  For two reasons:
·         First, I care about exhibiting whatever power I can to prove that there is a great injustice in this nation.
·         Second of all, I’m not afraid to “do.”
This second point is extremely important.  Indeed, all of you who need a lesson to learn from the occupiers; how about this?  Get out and DO!  It’s really very simple, but there are a ton of people scared to death of being involved.  At the same time, the movement would not be remotely the size it is today without people who are passionate and willing to march and occupy and, in some cases, be arrested.
I recently finished Ernest Hemingway’s book, For Whom the Bell Tolls.  It was a fantastic war novel which captured passion in both love and war.  Early on in the story, the main character, Robert Jordan is talking with two guerilla soldiers (occupiers) that are helping him out, Pablo and Anselmo.  Anselmo decides to draw attention to Pablo not wishing to fight, saying that he was afraid of the “fox.”  Thus, the man instigated an argument between himself and Pablo.  This is the dialogue which follows:
     “Very little,” said Anselmo scornfully.  “Very little in my judgment.  To steal, yes.  To eat well, yes.  To murder, yes.  To fight, no.”
     “You are an old man who will make himself trouble with his mouth.”
     “I am an old man who is afraid of no one,” Anselmo told him.  “Also I am an old man without horses.”
     “You are an old man who may not live long.”
     “I am an old man who will live until I die,” Anselmo said.  “And I am not afraid of foxes.”
Pablo said nothing but picked up the pack.
     “Nor of wolves either,” Anselmo said, picking up the other pack.” (Hemingway 16)
Therefore, I urge you to reflect about whether you are the fox, clever but without the courage to stand up for what you believe in?  Or are you prepared to fight the wolves?

Friday, October 28, 2011

Occupy Nashville Helps to Spark a Change

Last night, the police threw out the Occupy Nashville group.  About two dozen were arrested.  This came directly as a result of Bill Haslam and his extremely stupid laws that he has now tried to force on the occupiers.  So stupid, in fact, that the judge released all of those arrested and the ACLU is gearing up for a lawsuit against Tennessee.  Keep it up, police.  Keep it up, government.  Because you are about to see what many, capable and committed individuals can achieve.  The movement is still moving.  It won't be stopped until change is made, and action (though peaceful action) is about to be brought against those opposed to both, the 99% and justice.

Sunday, October 23, 2011

The Biblical Meaning Behind Occupy Wall Street and the 99%

Now, I know the 99% movement is not a "segregated" movement.  I do not wish to create any boundaries or upset people of different faiths; however, as an accepting movement, we should all listen to each other's beliefs, both political and religious.  I had a bible study with my dad earlier this week and he pointed out James 5 in Bible.  For those of you who do not have access to it, it is reproduced below:

     Now listen, you rich people, weep and wail because of the misery that is coming on you.  Your wealth has rotted, and moths have eaten your clothes.  Your gold and silver are corroded.  Their corrosion will testify against you and eat your flesh like fire.  You have hoarded wealth in the last days.  Look!  The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.  The cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Almighty.  You have lived on earth in luxury and self indulgence.  You have fattened yourselves in the day of slaughter.  You have condemned and murdered the innocent one, who was not opposing you.  ~James 5 (NIV)

To me, this chapter means a great deal.  It shows that nothing has changed in the last 5,000 years, at least!  We still have terrible injustices in the world, but it also shows that there are still people who are unafraid to stand up against this injustice.

A couple of lines particularly stand out for me.  The first is, "The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you."  Isn't that what's happening, hang on, right......NOW?!  So, there you have it.  After all of these years, the same groups still get together in an attempt to keep the filthy rich "honest."  But is the motive the same?  The second line verse that catches my eye is, "You have condemned and murdered the innocent one, who was not opposing you."  To me, this holds a couple of different meanings.  First of all, this could mean any innocent person put to death via the death penalty, but it also means the people who have died fighting a war for oil!  It is absolute insanity to die for this.  Furthermore, it is also in response to the people who have died because they were denied medical insurance despite the fact that they had a condition which would, in time, take them from this world.

It doesn't matter that we have separate beliefs.  For many, the Bible is the Word of God, but for many others, it should be taken as a book of philosophy, much in the same way that the world looks at Thoreau's Walden.  Indeed, all religious texts are, first and foremost, philosophies on life.  Some parts are good; others are bad, but all are important in order to understand that the frustrating times we are all going through right now.

Sunday, October 16, 2011

The Police of Wall Street

I can get not agreeing with the protesters of the 99% movement (though not without difficulty).  I can even get being angry with the protesters, but yesterday, when the occupiers of Wall Street were marching, a policeman decided to hit a woman.  Now, why on earth does a policeman need to put his hands on a woman who is participating in a nonviolent protest?  Today, when I participated in a march, they gave us the phone number of an attorney we could call in case we were arrested.  On today’s protest, luckily, the police set an example of what all police departments across the country should be like and protected us.  However, the actions of the police at Wall Street don’t make sense.  The actions shouldn’t make sense.  The policeman at Wall Street was probably just doing what he thought his job was; however, the fact is, he took his job to a terrible extreme that speaks ill of his group.  If it really was okay for him to do what he did, then his “orders” make him no better than any other abusive person and he, too, should be imprisoned with those that his fellow policemen took in yesterday.

Monday, October 10, 2011

The 99%

Throughout time, the world has seen many people and many groups of people walk its lands.  Most of these people generally, although sometimes begrudgingly, accept the policies of government and follow the rules of society.  However, there always seems to be one group at any given point which has challenged the system.  There was Christ, that is when he was preaching, and his followers, as well as the gypsies of Medieval Europe.  Skipping ahead, with the formation of America, the Transcendentalists made their mark early on in the history of America.  Since then, America has hardly been without a group who has challenged “the system.”  Abolitionists, the Knights of Labor, Beatniks, Hippies; all of these groups were speaking, expressing and, in some cases, fighting for freedom.  What’s more is that they have all managed to affect, however significant, change.
Where is this group today?  It has been a half of a century since the Hippies marched for a cause.  These people now look to a different generation.  Indeed, some of their kids look toward a new generation of leaders, of speakers; of people willing to fight for what is right.  These people must make it their mission to make a stand for Americans, as it is Americans who have been taken advantage of.
But what are these people making a stand for?  It is a thoughtful question.  As a group, there must be a set of ideals that we are fighting for.  Unlike in times before, the frustration most prevalent today is not focused on equal rights of a single, disadvantaged group.  Rather, it is directed more toward receiving care and having our voices heard for the purpose of equality for the extensive, disadvantaged majority.
Although it sometimes seems that there is not enough apparent frustration in America at present to start a group, something truly remarkable has come to pass in the last couple of weeks.  It seemed to be in direct response to the thoughts described above.  People have begun to protest.  First, it started on Wall Street in New York City.  Some college students began an occupation of Wall Street to declare their unhappiness with major corporations and the government.  The idea has now grown to become an international response to injustice.  Occupations have now begun in forty-five of the fifty United States.  These protesters call themselves the 99%, a name in response to the wealthiest 1% of America.  As of 2001, the wealthiest 1% of Americans held 38% of the nation’s wealth.
On Saturday, October 08, 2011, I attended a meeting of the “Occupy Nashville” group.  As a group, “Occupy Nashville” has now set up a permanent spot to “occupy.”  Protests are happening and it seems that the spirit of these committed individuals will continue to fight (like those around the country and globe) until reasonable change is made.  It is unacceptable to stand and watch as these corporations and the government take advantage of Americans who cannot afford to live in luxury, like that top 1%.
Currently, there are a lot of people out in the world who are feeling the khakified syndrome.  It is something they would normally dismiss as unfortunate but normal.  This time, a group has embraced this feeling, and has now inspired people to think, as John Steinbeck wrote, “If I’ve missed this, what else have I failed to see?”  This is a movement full of, not people looking for an easy way out, not people who just want to be angry, but people who have a reason to be angry because of the injustice they have had to endure for so long.
Take that, Herman Cain!

Thursday, September 29, 2011

The American Flag

The groundbreaking ceremony for the Muslim mosque was yesterday.  It came as a great, positive moment for this group in Murfreesboro.  Two to three hundred people showed-up to take part in the ceremony.  As I watched and talked with attendees of the event, I listened to the Muslim adults on why they had come to America.  Their answers were basically the same:  they had come here for freedom, something they are very grateful for.  Furthermore, they talked about how their friends and family, who are still overseas, long for America.  What a testament to the ideals of this country.
However, in the parking lot of the church next to the building site, three men stood and stared with disapproval.  They came in a big, Ford truck with a fiery bald eagle on the side and a massive American flag flying in the bed.
So let me get this straight…These men were protesting the freedom of these Muslim people with the symbols of America and the freedom it embodies?  Seeing these men and their flag made me rethink what that symbol stands for.  The Muslim community looked upon the flag as a symbol of hope, of the possibility of new things.  For the Muslim people, yesterday marked an advancement of their culture for future generations in this area.
The “other guys” took the flag to mean that America was a place for safety and security.  It was their belief that their freedoms were being taken away because a group of people, they hated, were being given rights.  It’s perverted logic, but it is how they rationalize their misplaced fear.  They told the local news that it was the Muslim belief system which was so dangerous.  I guess they missed the point that the Muslim religion worships the same God as Christians and they believe in Jesus too.
So what does the flag really stand for?  We like to think it stands for “liberty,” but if we put stipulations on who can have liberty, then exactly what does our flag symbolize?  What has happened to the flag’s meaning?  What is clear is that the Muslim people find great hope and opportunity from it.  This other meaning, though, is ugly.  The American Flag does not seem to stand for what it used to, so I now question what America stands for:  Freedom?  Justice?  These values used to be understood and available to all.  If our country is to regain this kind of position, then we are going to need “change”.  We must have change in our hearts, our minds and our actions, from being interfering to being accepting.  Americans can do this, but the direction we move in must be positive.

Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Corner of Your Eye

Sometimes we do not see what is so plainly against the laws of goodness and fairness and equality in life.  We can walk past it, run over it and push through it without a conscious thought towards its unfair state.  It is only when we stop and stare at it that we finally see the pain it causes.
This may not make sense to a lot of people.  Indeed, they have most likely fallen victim to this idea that all is fair in love and war, but it’s not.  When you see the homeless man on the side of the street begging for food, what thoughts pass through your head?  Probably things like, “He deserves this,” or, “That’s just too bad.”  Maybe, if you are filled with compassion, you will pledge yourself to try and help people like him; however, this will almost immediately become like a New Year’s Resolution; something you would like to do, but without enough gumption to ever start.
It doesn’t even have to be someone who is so obviously struggling.  How about the married man who has lost his income, but is still trying to keep his family together?  This man may have it worse than the homeless man; for he must persevere for his family and be strong for those he loves despite the little hope that exists.  The struggle can make one lose faith and dignity, a terrible blow with defeat so near.
Whoever it is, we rarely take out the time to see and to feel the pain that they are going through.  In the first episode, of the first season of “Doctor Who” with Matt Smith as the Doctor, there is an alien hiding in a house with a simple cloaking device around the room he stays in.  The way the cloaking device works is that the room directs your attention slightly to the right or left of the door, thereby making it invisible.  The Doctor locates the room by looking out of the “corner of his eye.”  The subliminal message behind this episode is that one can see something that he/she hasn’t before, by simply paying attention in a different way.
This is a necessary part of life if the whole story is to be attained.  It has always been said that one must weigh and think and let ideas simmer on both sides to get the whole story.  If this is not done, then one group will think it is better than another and conflicts begin to arise.  A great way of explaining this comes from the book, Mountains Beyond Mountains, by Tracy Kidder.  Kidder’s book documents some of the great things that the protagonist, Paul Farmer, did while helping people from Haiti.  In one paragraph, Kidder explains Farmer’s use of the word comma:
     This was for me one of the first of many encounters with Farmer’s use of the word comma, placed at the end of a sentence.  It stood for the word that would follow the comma, which was asshole.  I understood he wasn’t calling me one – he would never do that; he was almost invariably courteous.  Comma was always directed at third parties, at those who felt comfortable with the current distribution of money and medicine in the world.  And the implication, of course, was that you weren’t one of those.  Were you? (Kidder, 24)
This explains the issue of a one-sided approach.  It is important to research both or all (for many issues are not double- but rather multi-sided) sides of a problem before creating any judgment whatsoever.
In the end, we must make a difference, however small, in changing some aspect of the world.  Even if it is changing someone’s belief, this change is one more step in the right direction.  Why, one might ask, is this so important?  One little change in attitude cannot make enough of a difference.  My answer is because we care.  We ought to care because it is right to care.  Comma.